Why Experienced Testers Think Differently from Vulnerability Scanners

The team could adhere to the secure coding standards as well as update dependencies and yet ship a vulnerability which did not get noticed. The reason for this is that the real attackers don’t always follow a checklist. An attacker might mix a weak authorization with an exposed API, misuse a workflow for password reset, or discover that data from one tenant can be access by a different.

Professional penetration testing Brisbane businesses use for security assurance looks at systems from that adversarial perspective. Instead of asking whether there are security controls experts will inquire if those controls can be bypassed.

For Australian businesses that handle customer data and financial data, as well as healthcare records, or any other sensitive assets, the difference matters.

The automated scanning is just part of the story.

Vulnerability scanners are very useful. They can identify obsolete software, insecure headers recognized CVEs, and any obvious issues with configuration. They don’t know how an application must behave.

Imagine a portal for customers who want to access invoices of a different business and also change their account number. A scanner that is automated will not see anything abnormal if a server is delivering exactly valid results. A human test-taker can identify the error immediately.

Automated web penetration testing combined with manual analysis is the secret to a high-quality test. Testers examine authentication, sessions, access controls and injection risk, API behavior, weaknesses in configuration and business processes, while looking for combinations of flaws which could result in significant harm.

SaaS environments have their own security risks

Cloud applications that are multi-tenant require careful testing because one mistake could affect a large number of customers at once.

Saas penetration tests should cover tenant isolation and privileged functions. It should also include API authorization, role changes, account recovery, data leakage, and integrations to external services. The tester must not only understand if a feature is working however, they must also determine if it can be manipulated in a manner that the team developing it could not have intended.

If a user has been assigned the role of a user that doesn’t include administrative features, they may not notice them in the interface. It does not always mean they can’t call it directly. Active testing is required for this to be done, instead of simply reviewing the screen.

Modern web applications have a greater attack surface

Applications of today often combine JavaScript front-ends with APIs, cloud service providers as well as identity providers and microservices. There is a weakness that can be found in any one of these components or the trust between them.

Comprehensive penetration testing of websites analyzes these connections. The testers will be able to examine how tokens and authorization are handled, whether secure servers enforce the same rules in the way data is moved between services by users, and even if a vulnerability that appears to be not a risk may be linked to another vulnerability for a serious attack.

Siege Cyber is specialized in this kind of application testing. It works with modern APIs and frameworks, as well in cloud-hosted applications as well as complex architectures.

The report will aid developers fix the issue

Finding vulnerabilities is only half of the work. The most effective security testing is when the engineers can reproduce and understand the problem, in addition to resolving the risk.

Siege Cyber reports include evidence reproducibility steps and risk ratings, as well as impact analysis, as well as practical recommendations for remediation. Business stakeholders are provided with an executive explanation of the issue and technical teams receive the detail needed to resolve the issue. Instead of waiting until the final report, critical findings can be communicated to business stakeholders at the time of the process.

Following remediation, retesting can provide an extra layer of protection by verifying that the original vulnerability has been fixed and not causing a fresh vulnerability.

Penetration testing is a great tool for organizations that are trying to test their systems, prove conformance or increase confidence prior to the release of a major version. Automated tools and policies don’t offer this, but it allows them a controlled way of determining the way a skilled hacker would take on the software. Discovering the answer before an actual adversary is what makes the process important.

Subscribe Us

Get more travel inspiration, tips and exclusive offers sent straight to your inbox

Gallery